[milan 0]

Do this features work well?

Can it replace need for EM tool up to some frequencies?

 

[sergej34 0]

I have tried but results are very poor. I don't recommend.

[milan 0]

Is calibre better?

[sergej34 0]

No, the same story.

[milan 0]

What is then your recommendation?

[sergej34 0]

Use EM tools for that purpose. Like HFSS, Momentum,...

[milan 0]

But sometimes they are too slow for extraction. :(

[sergej34 0]

I use EMX, because it is very fast. You can extract very big circuit using this tool.

[milan 0]

I have red something about it but I didn't use.

There is not enough information available about EMX.

Website is very poor.

[sergej34 0]

It is great tool it uses fastmultipl method for simulation.

It is 10x faster then others.

[milan 0]

That is great. But what about accuracy?

[sergej34 0]

It is not as accurace as hfss, but for parasitic extraction is very good.

[milan 0]

I have read that it is integrated in calibre design flow.

If anyone has document for integration calibre and EMX, pleas share.

Изменено 9 мая, 2015 пользователем milan

[sergej34 0]

Please, share with me also.:)

[milan 0]

They have build interface for cadence.

Using this you could simulate faster.